Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Free Father Mattaos -- Coptic (Egyptian Christian) Priest is Unjustly Tried and Imprisoned in Egypt



Father Mattaos. Photo: Media Avisory

Free Father Mattaos -- Coptic (Egyptian Christian) Priest is Unjustly Tried and Imprisoned in Egypt

MEDIA ADVISORY, April 29 /Christian Newswire/ -- Father Mattaos Wahba, is the priest of Archangel Michael Church at Kerdasa, Geza, Egypt. He is a pious man of God who encourages his congregation with Jesus' message of loving one's enemy, blessing those who curse you; doing good to those who hate you; and praying for those who despitefully use and persecute you. (Mathew 5:44) Fr. Mattaos is a model Egyptian citizen that has not ever committed a crime or seen the inside of a prison other than in the context of ministering to inmates.

Recently Father Mattaos' life abruptly changed overnight. He was arrested, charged and tried for aiding a young Muslim woman in getting an ID card that had falsified data indicating her religion as Christian rather than Muslim. The ID card was said to enable her to marry a Christian man and to flee the country. On October, 2008, the court found him guilty and sentenced him to 5 years at hard labor.

However, the facts dictate entirely a different story. The young woman, named Reham Abdel Aziz Rady, was born to a Muslim family. She converted to Christianity and underwent unbearable degrees of torturous harassments from her family and Egypt's Secret Police. She was subsequently released from custody without an ID card. Such prevents her rightful privileges of citizenship. She cannot get employment, rent living quarter, apply for a passport; much less apply for a marriage license. Even, if she still possessed her old Muslim ID, it would prevent her from marrying a Christian. There is no legal way to change the religion of a Muslim in an ID card.

In 2004, a well-intentioned person attempted to help her. They allowed Reham to use an ID card belonging to a recently deceased young Christian woman of approximately the same age, named Mariam Nabil. Two years later, Reham, now called Mariam, and a Christian man fell in love and decided to marry. The couple contacted Fr. Mattaos to conduct the marriage ceremonies. The priest knew nothing of the false ID and Mariam's former Muslim background. In good faith he conducted the ceremony and the newly wed couple fled the country.

On April 24, 2009, Mariam appeared with Brother Rasheed on the popular Arabic Al Hayat TV program "A Daring Question". She testified, "Father Mattaos did not have any role in getting my ID card. I did not know him then, as this took place in 2004 and I got married in 2006." Mariam added, "I have the right to have an ID card that reflects my true religious affiliation. The Egyptian government does not give Muslims who convert to Christianity a legal alternative to get these papers. Had I been a Christian who wanted to convert to Islam, I would have had all the help I needed. But, because I am leaving Islam they put hurdles in my way."

Father Mattaos did not commit a crime. He does not deserve to be imprisoned. He is paying a price of Egypt's present-day policy of denying religious freedom. Ironically, their policy is against the Egyptian constitution and standard human rights laws to which Egypt is a signatory. Make no mistake about it. Father Mattaos' imprisonment is designed to send a message to Coptic Egyptian priests and Protestant pastors: The Egyptian government will deal harshly with any clergyman who is suspected in aiding Muslims converting to Christianity.

We call upon officials in the US State Department; Human Rights organizations; the global community of Christian believers; and all freedom loving people to join us in our outcry. We urge you to contact the Egyptian Embassy demanding the immediate release of Father Mattaos. Insist in strong tones that every Egyptian citizen be granted the basic human right to follow the religion of his/her choice.

EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT

3521 International Ct. NW Washington DC 20008

TEL: 202.895.5400 FAX: 202.244.4319

E-mail: Embassy@egyptembassy.ne

3mnewswire.org

Schweine-Grippe - jetzt Mexiko-Grippe: Das Stuttgarter Gesundheitsamt beobachtet die Entwicklung weiterhin sorgfältig

Schweine-Grippe - jetzt Mexiko-Grippe: Das Stuttgarter Gesundheitsamt beobachtet die Entwicklung weiterhin sorgfältig

Projektlenkungsgruppe Pandemieplanung tritt heute zur Lagebewertung erneut zusammen - Gesundheitsamt hat Sondertelefondienst eingerichtet

Stuttgart. (red). 29. April Laut Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO), Stand 28. April, und Robert-Koch-Institut, Stand 29. April, gibt es inzwischen in Europa sieben
bestätigte Fälle der neuen Influenza A/H1N1, der sogenannten Schweine-Grippe, davon drei in Deutschland: zwei in Bayern und ein Fall in Hamburg. Weitere Erkrankungen in Deutschland sind nicht auszuschließen.


Daher tritt die Projektlenkungsgruppe Pandemieplanung der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart heute erneut zusammen, um sich über die aktuelle Situation auszutauschen.

Die Stadt kann im Ereignisfall auf einen sorgfältig ausgearbeiteten und aktuellen Influenza-Pandemieplan zurückgreifen, der alle tangierten Bereiche umfasst. Auch die Stuttgarter Kliniken haben Pläne zur Versorgung von Influenza-Patienten während einer Pandemie. Darüber hinaus steht im Bedarfsfall und zur Sicherstellung der wesentlichen öffentlichen Funktionen und Patientenversorgung das Medikament Tamiflu zur Verfügung.

Ersten Untersuchungen des amerikanischen Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov zufolge scheinen die gängigen Medikamente Tamiflu und Relenza wirksam zu sein. Über die Wirksamkeit der üblichen saisonalen Grippeimpfung gegen das neue Virus liegen bisher keine Erkenntnisse vor.

Das Stuttgarter Gesundheitsamt wird bis auf Weiteres täglich eine Pressemitteilung zur Information über die aktuelle Lage herausgeben.

Aktuelle Informationen zum Infektionsgeschehen finden sich auf denInternetseiten des Robert Koch-Instituts unter www.rki.de.

Telefonische Auskunft erhalten Sie beim Gesundheitsamt der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Telefon 07 11/2 16-70 70, von 8 bis 16 Uhr sowie beim Robert Koch-Institut, Telefon 0 30/1 87 54 41 61, von 8 bis 18 Uhr.

3mnewswire.org

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Scharfe Kritik von Dirk Niebel zu Hetz-Parolen

Scharfe Kritik von Dirk Niebel zu Hetz-Parolen

Berlin.(red/and). 24. April 2009. Zu den Forderungen des Die Linke-Politikers Oskar Lafontaine, wonach Arbeiter in Deutschland jetzt die Manager einsperren sollten, erklärte FDP-Generalsekretär Dirk Niebel:


„Oskar Lafontaine redet wie Alt-Kommunisten und Neo-Nazis. Das ist blanke Klassenkampf-Hetze. Die Extremisten von links und rechts ähneln eben wie ein Ei dem anderen.

Egal, wie unerträglich der Müll ist, der aus Oskar Lafontaine heraus bricht, so ist es doch die Aufgabe von Demokraten, dafür zu sorgen, dass er weiterhin die Möglichkeit hat, ihn von sich zu geben.“

Indirekt spricht sich damit Dirk Niebel auch gegen eine Zensur von politischen Standpunkten aus, die nicht seinen Überzeugungen entsprechen.

3mnewswire.org

Friday, April 24, 2009

Indonesian Court's ruling in favor of Time's multi-million dollar defamation case a landmark in press freedom in Southeast Asia

Indonesian Court's ruling in favor of Time's multi-million dollar defamation case a landmark in press freedom in Southeast Asia

Bangkok. April 24, 2009/SEAPA/-- The Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA) welcomes the landmark ruling of the Indonesian supreme court in favor of "Time Magazine"
in a US$106-million defamation suit filed against the magazine by former dictator Suharto.


The ruling, handed down on 16 April, marked the end of the appeals process. The court said "Time Magazine" does not have to pay damages to the estate of Suharto.

One of the judges said, "Basically, everyone has the right to hold opinion, including different views with others. Therefore, the media in performing their function could possibly [express contrary opinions]. That is the manifestation of democracy and openness. The only obligation for media is to report with clear source although there is a possibility of differences in opinion between the reporter and the object of the report."

The defamation charges stemmed from "Time Magazine's" cover story in its Asian edition in May 1999, saying Suharto's family had pocketed billions of dollars during the three decades that he was in power. Much of this illegal fund reportedly came from oil and mining, forestry, property, banking and petrochemicals, with the
bulk stashed in overseas banks. Suharto sought more than US$27 billion dollars in damages against the Asian edition of "Time".

The Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) Indonesia, a SEAPA founding member based in Jakarta, said "the court has made a correct decision and it is an important development in press law in Indonesia. First, the Supreme Court recognizes press' code of conduct as a benchmark to determine press' illegal conduct. Press,
which has complied with such code in its reporting, cannot be categorized as a crime."

AJI Indonesia Chairman Nezar Patria added in the statement that their organization "is of the opinion that this verdict should be made as a sample for law enforcement, particularly judges, in handing down verdicts involving the press."

In February last year, the publication submitted a demand for a review of the supreme court's earlier ruling, saying it had been a "manifest error."

"Time Magazine's" article said that a four-month investigation in 11 countries revealed that the former dictator and his six children stashed away some US$15 billion dollars in illegally-gotten wealth.

The former strongman, who stepped down from power in 1998 amidstwidespread protests and economic crisis, denied he has ill-gotten wealth.

Source: SEAPA

Vice Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium Addresses the Meeting

The Durban Review Conference

Vice Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium Addresses the Meeting

New York. April 24, 2009/UN/-- The Durban Review Conference on Thursday, April 23, 2009 concluded its general debate after hearing from a long series national delegations and other stakeholders who raised a variety of issues relating to the importance of fully implementing the provisions of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and dealing with new forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.


During the meeting, the Review Conference resumed briefly its high-level segment to hear the statement of Karel De Gucht, Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium, who said that the Review Conference was supposed to evaluate the progress made in the fight against racism and discrimination, and it was necessary to admit that racism persisted, including in Belgium. In certain regions of the world, people continued to suffer from discrimination in employment and housing, people were killed because they dared change their religion, and women were the victims of discrimination. Belgium had solid legislation to fight against racism and all forms of discrimination. However, this should be accompanied by increased vigilance and constant commitment to ensure a free and tolerant society.

Mr. De Gucht said it was necessary to condemn without reserve the intolerant and hate-filled declarations of the Iranian President at this rostrum. These declarations were contrary to the principles and values of the United Nations, and were shocking, contradicting both the letter and the spirit of the outcome document. Those who defended intolerant and radical positions should not be allowed to take the Conference hostage. Similar sentiments were expressed by a number of speakers in the general segment.

Speakers in the general segment expressed a variety of sentiments and raised a number of issues. Some said it was not plausible or acceptable to witness the prevalence in many countries of the manifestations of racism and racial discrimination. The Review Conference was an opportunity of assessing failures in order to gain new victories in eliminating racism. Prejudice based on religion, culture, lack of knowledge, intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief were detrimental to the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms as well as the promotion of peaceful culture. Commensurate remedies for the evils of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance required that all United Nations Member States showed real political will to apply them fully. There was no contradiction in simultaneously protecting people against racial discourse and incitement to racial and religious hatred, and ensuring that freedom of expression remained one of the key pillars of society.

The increasing frequency of attacks on religious personalities and symbols, especially in some countries, were fomenting and spreading hatred and aggravating intolerance, speakers said. While respecting and esteeming the principle of freedom of expression, it was unacceptable that freedom of expression should be protected and defended at the expense of other violations of human rights. One speaker said developed countries, which were mainly responsible for the financial crisis, should cancel the debt of African countries as a way of making up for the exploitation of the continent for hundreds of years. Poverty, underdevelopment, marginalization, social exclusion and economic disparities were closely linked to racism and other intolerances. Racism perpetuated poverty and underdevelopment since it marginalized and excluded populations from having equal opportunities to development.

Speaking in the general segment were representatives of Togo, Malaysia, Viet Nam, Saudi Arabia, Eritrea, Republic of Korea, Portugal, Rwanda, Slovenia, Guatemala, Guyana, Benin, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Luxembourg, Turkey, Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Denmark.

Representatives of the Pan-African Parliament, League of Arab States, United nations educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Labour Organization, the African Union, Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie, UNAIDS, Inter-American Development Bank, and the Non-Aligned Movement Centre for Human Rights and Cultural Diversity also took the floor.

Also speaking were Prince Hassan Bin Talal of Jordan (via video conference) and Edna Maria Santos Roland, two of the five Independent Eminent Experts appointed by the Secretary-General to follow-up the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action; Naela Gabr, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women; Zonke Zanele Majodina, Vice-Chair of the Human Rights Committee; Asma Jahangir, Chair of the Coordination Committee of Special Procedures; Mohammed Al-Tarawneh, Chair of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Fatimata-Binta Dah, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination; Joe Frans, Chair of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent; and a representative of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.

Japan spoke in right of reply.

The Review Conference on Thursday April 23, 2009 has been meeting non-stop from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.. When it continued its work at 2:30 p.m., it started its discussion on issues arising from the objectives of the Conference.

General Segment


ABDELAHAD GAMALELDIN, of the Pan-African Parliament, said Africa sent a message of love and respect to Governments, non-governmental organizations and all organizations participating in the work of the Review Conference. The Pan-African Parliament worked to respond to the needs and dreams of the African peoples for progress, regional integration and unity, and was hopeful for the establishment of an international system free of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and free of double standards and violations of international legitimacy. The Pan-African Parliament fully endorsed the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and the outcome document. All should commit themselves to previous pacts and instruments which aimed at protecting the human rights of individuals and preserving their humanity. It was not plausible or acceptable to witness the prevalence in many countries of the manifestations of racism and racial discrimination. Developed countries, which were mainly responsible for the financial crisis, should cancel the debt of African countries as a way of making up for the exploitation of the continent for hundreds of years.

NAKPA POLO (Togo) said the Government of Togo was determined to support all initiatives to protect and promote respect for human dignity and ensure a solid culture of peace in the world. Togo supported the international system to protect and promote human rights, and had shown this by ratifying all international human rights instruments, including the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. The Durban Conference was an important stage in mankind, and was a clear expression of mankind's rejection of racism and its various forms of contemporary manifestations. Equality and the enjoyment of human rights remained a great challenge for humankind. Human rights and dignity were the same for all, and they could not be denied on the basis of sex, ethnicity, culture, religion, or caste. The United Nations was constantly making efforts to eliminate all forms of discrimination, nevertheless, racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance were breaking out anew in all parts of the world. Arguments on the supposed inequality of cultures continued to wreak havoc. This Conference was an opportunity of assessing failures in order to gain new victories in eliminating racism.

OTHMAN HASHIM (Malaysia) reaffirmed Malaysia's full support for the mechanisms established by the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. Malaysia firmly believed that the establishment of those mechanisms provided the international community with the needed space to ensure constant monitoring and action-oriented discussion on racism and related issues, including new and emerging forms of racial discrimination and xenophobia. The Government pursued policies towards fostering national unity, improving nation integration, promoting a culture of respect and tolerance and reducing tendencies toward racial polarisation among the population. An important area of primary focus for the Government's efforts in fighting against racism was education, and it was investing heavily in education. On average, 6 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product had been allocated to education over the years. Malaysia was ready to continue working with all parties to contribute further to the ongoing efforts of the international community to fight all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance.

VU DUNG (Viet Nam) expressed its deep concern about existing gaps, challenges and obstacles which remained in the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, in particular the worrying incidents of racial and religious discrimination taking place in many parts of the world. Prejudice based on religion, culture, lack of knowledge, intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief were detrimental to the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms as well as the promotion of peaceful culture. Viet Nam believed that the most important foundation for preserving peace and reconciliation was to strengthen tolerance and understanding based on respect of different religions and cultural diversity. The rights to freedom of opinion and expression and freedom of the press and information should be respected and guaranteed by law and in practice. However, the exercise of those rights should go in hand with the need of respect of dignity, values of virtue, tradition and culture and should not incite hatred among nations and religions. Using the freedom of opinion and expression to defame other national and regional groups should be considered as an act of violation of legitimate human rights of others.

ANDREI SAVINYKH (Belarus) said eight years after the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, the problems of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance continued to be urgent problems. In the context of growing globalisation, societies were becoming ever more variegated and multicultural, and States were faced with the need to ensure mutual respect between peoples of different origins in order to establish social harmony and integration. The creation in societies of an atmosphere of tolerance and mutual respect depended a great deal on State policies and political will. There could be no successful resolution of this situation when the artificial hierarchy of human rights remained, and combating discrimination remained a "secondary concern". Countries needed to combat racism and discrimination also in the international arena - mutual understanding and respect for the many different ways of development was an inalienable part of human civilisation. In spite of the fact that in the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action significant attention was given to the need to combat human trafficking, this problem had not yet been alleviated.

ABDULWAHAB ATTAR (Saudi Arabia) said in spite of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action adopted in 2001, the causes that fostered racism were increasing in the contemporary world. Saudi Arabia was concerned about the various phenomena that were among the causes and sources of racism. One negative phenomenon was the increasing frequency of attacks on religious personalities and symbols, especially in some countries, which were fomenting and spreading hatred and aggravating intolerance. While respecting and esteeming the principle of freedom of expression, it was unacceptable that freedom of expression should be protected and defended at the expense of other violations of human rights. Saudi Arabia condemned defamation of religions and beliefs and disparagement of the personalities and symbols, not only of the Islamic religion, but also of other religions and beliefs. It was also important to reference that some groups and peoples throughout the world were being subjected to various racist practices. The racist separation wall had adverse effects and serious consequences on the economic, social and cultural situation of the Palestinian people. Moreover, both Christian and Muslim Palestinians were being prevented from exercising their right to freedom of worship and access to their holy places in Jerusalem.

High-Level Segment

KAREL DE GUCHT, Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium, said the fight against racism and discrimination required an unambiguous response from the international community - this was the least that could be done for the victims of racism and discrimination. It was necessary to condemn without reserve the intolerant and hate-filled declarations of the Iranian President at this rostrum. These declarations were contrary to the principles and values of the United Nations, and were shocking, contradicting both the letter and the spirit of the outcome document. Those who defended intolerant and radical positions should not be allowed to take the Conference hostage. The Conference was supposed to evaluate the progress made in the fight against racism and discrimination, and it was necessary to admit that racism persisted, including in Belgium. In certain regions of the world, people continued to suffer from discrimination in employment and housing, people were killed because they dared change their religion, and women were the victims of discrimination.

Belgium had solid legislation to fight against racism and all forms of discrimination, however, this should be accompanied by increased vigilance and constant commitment to ensure a free and tolerant society. The final result of the Conference represented, of course, a compromise, the fruit of difficult and tense negotiations, and thus could not respond to the needs of all. Neither did the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. However, it did have the merit of constituting a solid basis to fight against racism and discrimination, despite the excesses caused by extremist and unacceptable statements. The international community should continue to work for cooperation and multilateral action when a civil population was the victim of grave human rights violations, and should continue to be committed to international law, which was, for these victims, the ultimate recourse allowing them at least some form of justice. Democracy was a universal value, and equality between individuals was a universal principle.

Racism and intolerance could push human beings to commit the worst atrocities. The Holocaust had been commemorated on Monday, and this April brought the fifteenth anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda, and thus the international community should spare a thought for all victims of racism and discrimination everywhere in the world. The outcome document could only make a difference for the victims if the international community lived up to its responsibilities and truly implemented the commitments that it accepted therein. This was the duty before the international community as a whole. Belgium, in this context, would continue to work for a greater multilateral cooperation, and effective multilateralism.

General Segment


FESSAHAZION PIETROS (Eritrea) said that the Durban Review Document was another milestone in humanity's struggle and search for solutions that would foster harmonious coexistence of peoples, based on mutual respect and tolerance. All human beings were born free and equal in dignity and rights. Any doctrine of racial superiority should not only be rejected, but the fight against it must be unrelenting by all stakeholders. The Review Conference gave the international community once more another important opportunity to further crystallize their commitments and intensify the struggle in confronting their common concern in order to collectively search for ways and means to eliminate racism. Racism, with its deep-rooted tentacles in all phases of peoples' lives, was known to continue to affect the political, social, economic and cultural situations of millions of people in many regions of the world. Remedies for and the struggle against those phenomena must therefore be sought for and promoted at all levels of human interactions. Poverty, underdevelopment, marginalization, social exclusion, and economic disparities were closely linked to racism and other intolerances. Racism perpetuated poverty and underdevelopment since it marginalized and excluded populations from having equal opportunities to development.

LEE SUNG-JOO (Republic of Korea) said that the outcome document held universal validity, offering an effective guideline for the fight against racial discrimination regardless of region or ethnicity. A delicate balance had been struck between exercising the freedom of expression and taking responsibility for its consequences. There would be an opportunity to discuss ways and means to enhance the effectiveness and transparency of the follow-up mechanisms to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action in the Human Rights Council. For this reason, the Republic of Korea welcomed the fact that the outcome document was adopted by consensus. One should not tolerate intolerance, but rather unite against any attempt to politicize this Conference and to use this forum to incite hatred and division. Korean society was becoming increasingly diverse, and appropriate administrative and legislative measures to ensure the smooth integration of foreigners had been taken. For example, among other things, the Government had enacted the law on Support for Multicultural Families to protect the human rights of foreigners, including migrant workers and their children living in the Republic of Korea.

FRANCISCO XAVIER ESTEVES (Portugal) said racial discrimination was a denial of one of the most fundamental rights - the right to equality, which led to a denial of countless other human rights and fundamental freedoms. History had shown terrible examples of racism occurring throughout the world, in the most serious cases leading to ethnic cleansing and genocide. The international community needed to remain vigilant and to prevent the recurrence of such tragedies. The main goal of the Conference was to assess progress and implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. In taking stock today, the international community needed to recommit itself to promote the universal ratification of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and enhance efforts towards its full implementation at local, national, regional and international levels. It was crucial that all victims of racism were treated equally and awarded the same level of protection - there should be no hierarchisation between victims of racism or between different forms of racism as all forms of racial discrimination were unacceptable. Issues from the past should primarily be remembered as an incitement to fight racism today. The international community should not waste yet another opportunity and should work together to advance the common cause to prevent, combat and eradicate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

VENETIA SEBUDANDI (Rwanda) said that since its independence in 1962, Rwanda had experienced a succession of political regimes that had been characterized by divisionism and discrimination based on ethnicity. This had been reinforced and facilitated by the existence of official national identity cards that clearly separated people according to their ethnic groupings, namely Hutu, Tutsi and Twa. These forms of divisions, discrimination and exclusion eventually led Rwandans into an abyss with a culture of human rights violations with impunity. The sad climax of all this was the 1994 genocide committed against the Tutsi in Rwanda which claimed over 1 million innocent and defenseless victims. After the genocide, the priority of the Government of National Unity that was put in place was to rebuild the nation with an emphasis on promoting national unity and reconciliation, ending the culture of impunity and establishing the rule of law, while at the same time undertaking efforts to promote socio-economic development and policies that ensured equal opportunities for all in all areas, including universal free primary school education and medical insurance cover for all, among other measures. Rwanda's call to the international community today was that genocide must be understood and taken for what it was, without ambiguity: the most heinous crime against humanity.

ANDREJ LOGAR (Slovenia) said Slovenia was firmly committed to the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance at the national, regional and international levels. Slovenia deplored and firmly rejected the statement delivered by the President of Iran. It had to be stressed that, in combating racism and discrimination, all fundamental rights, including freedom of belief and freedom of expression, had to be fully respected. The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination gave a sufficient basis for the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance, including against their contemporary forms. The wide inclusion of civil society in the Durban process was supported. The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action had to be better implemented not only in countries, but also in regional organizations. Slovenia planned to host a regional conference on the education of Roma. In addition, there was the Roma campaign "Dosta", an awareness raising campaign. Slovenia firmly believed that education in general and human rights education in particular were essential elements in combating different forms of racism and discrimination.

CARLOS RAMIRO MARTINEZ ALVARADO (Guatemala) said the international community was meeting here almost eight years after the World Conference in Durban and the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. These instruments were a political framework, complementing other international human rights instruments and undertakings. Considerable progress had been made in Guatemala in combating racism and racial discrimination, although much still remained to be done. Public policy had been designed to encourage peaceful coexistence, and there was a public agenda for indigenous peoples. Sectoral policies had been implemented tackling racism and racial discrimination in various areas including housing, health, the development of micro- small- and medium-sized enterprises, HIV/AIDS, the situation of women, and sustainable agricultural development. The Presidential Statement against Discrimination and Racism against Indigenous Peoples was a follow-up mechanism for combating racism and racial discrimination and contained proposals to eradicate these practices. There was still a lot to do, and Guatemala was prepared to meet these challenges, in parallel with the commitments it had taken on.

PATRICK GOMES (Guyana) said that the international community must recognize slavery and the transatlantic trade of Africans as crimes committed against humanity, and also that descendents of victims of such criminal practices, as well as the victims of colonialism and the genocide applied to indigenous peoples, should receive the reparation and compensation they deserved. While these were historical events of sad memory for all humanity, the continuing injustice and horrendous crimes being committed against the Palestinian people urgently deserved to be addressed in a comprehensive, consistent and principled manner. Guyana had maintained a longstanding support and commitment for the Palestinian people to achieve the full realization of their inalienable right to self-determination and a homeland of their own. In view of the recent bombing assault of Gaza resulting in the loss of lives, destruction of property and countless injury to innocent people, including women and children, Guyana once again called for vigorous and urgent pursuit and bringing to justice, in keeping with international law, those responsible for actions against the Palestinians.

THIERRY ALIA (Benin) said that in Durban in 2001, the international community resolved to protect individuals and States against the scourge of racism because incitement to hatred often provoked tragedies. It took political will to eradicate this racism. Since 2001 important developments had been achieved, in particular the adoption of legislation and the establishment of institutions around the world. Benin was committed to take the necessary measures to give effect to the various human rights instruments, including the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. It was imperative to strengthen the protection of victims of racism, both at the national and international levels. Education was important in the fight for a world without racism, because racism was insidious and must be combated at infancy. In this context, organizations of civil society, activists and people of good will who worked to promote human rights at the community level should be recognized and encouraged by States, making aware that each individual had dignity. The Durban Review Conference came at the right time to reaffirm that racism existed in all parts of the world and that it was incumbent on all Governments and societies to work towards its eradication.

SEBASTIEN MUTOMB MUJING (Democratic Republic of the Congo) said this was a historic meeting, and all negotiators should feel honoured for their distinguished contribution. After the Conference held in Durban in 2001, the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action to combat racism and all forms of intolerance had been adopted. These texts remained reference tools for all nations seeking to work effectively against the scourge of racism. This Conference should evaluate judiciously the progress made and implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, and should identify new measures to combat and eliminate all recent forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance which had emerged since the Durban Conference. Commensurate remedies for these evils required that all United Nations Member States showed real political will to apply them fully. Particularly vulnerable population groups, such as indigenous peoples, migrants and women deserved particular attention from all United Nations agencies and national Governments. There was a positive approach by all delegations, which had made it possible to adopt the outcome document. In the future, dividing and extremist positions should be avoided in order to avoid undermining the joint struggle against racism, and show that the international community was indeed concerned for the victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

JEAN FEYDER (Luxembourg) said that Luxembourg welcomed the consensus adoption of the final document. The document was a new landmark in mankind's struggle against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. It denounced anti-Semitism, it abstained from stigmatizing one region of the world, it underlined the essential principle of freedom of expression while reaffirming the imperative of fighting against incitement to hatred, and it reminded us of the Holocaust. The establishment of the United Nations and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination did not prevent the genocide in Rwanda nor the massacre of Srebrenica or others on almost all continents. The marginalization of the most vulnerable populations continued, be it the marginalization of women, indigenous peoples, ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities. States should strengthen their efforts to alleviate poverty, since it was one of the most frequent factors causing racial discrimination. Luxembourg's national policy in the fight against racism, Luxembourg being a member of the European Union, was in conformity with the European Union's policy. Since the first Durban Conference, Luxembourg had implemented an annual information and awareness raising campaign on the fight against discrimination. Racism was a scourge that concerned us all and no State was above criticism.

AHMET UZUMCU (Turkey) said that the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action constituted the basis of policies to fight racism. The Review Conference provided an opportunity to evaluate the implementation of these policies at the national and international levels as well as to address shortcomings in a self-critical manner. Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance constituted an attack on human dignity. Polarization along religious and cultural lines had grown over the past decade. There was no contradiction in simultaneously protecting people against racial discourse and incitement to racial and religious hatred, and ensuring that freedom of expression remained one of the key pillars of society. The discrimination and violence increasingly affecting migrants remained a serious challenge. Having more than four million citizens living in foreign countries as migrant workers with their families, Turkey has gained first hand experience about discrimination and xenophobia against them. Turkey welcomed the adoption of the outcome document. The consensual and carefully balanced document would help to further sensitize stakeholders and raise greater public awareness.

NANGUYALAI TARZI (Afghanistan) said this Review Conference which brought the international community together was based on the cause of universal sacred human rights, the right to live in peace and together. Humanity had taken on laws and rules based on best practices and customs of tolerance, mutual respect, and receptiveness. Afghanistan ensured space for each of these in its Constitution to harmonise life in a multi-faceted country which had, until the recent past, lived in peace, with a perfect balance between all its components. Many provisions of international instruments were transposed into domestic legislation in Afghanistan. One of the most important points was protection for women and their role, whether in terms of equality, or education, and new measures had been applied in this regard, and on the political level they were rejoining the space they had never left. Tolerance for the specific needs of minorities and the disabled and protection of children were all priorities and indeed commitments for Afghanistan.

ARCANJO DO NASCIMENTO (Angola) regretted that the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action had not had the expected impact on the lives of victims of racism, not because of the instrument but due to the lack of political will to implement preventive measures, education and protection aiming at eradicating racism at all levels, as well as strategies to achieve full equality between all human beings. In this context, Angola also regretted that the paragraph concerning the creation of a racial equality index was not part of the final document of the Durban Review Conference. It could be an additional and important tool to address many issues which the victims of racial discrimination were facing. As a country which had been a victim of colonial regime and slavery which cost millions of lives and completely destroyed the social structure of Angola, having an impact on its development, Angola did not see a need for further debate concerning the appropriate ways in which those responsible for this tragedy could contribute to address those problems and heal once and for all the scars of historical injustices.

CHOE MYONG NAM (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) said the World Conference held in Durban had been an important occasion to ensure dignity, equality, justice, and development of all races and nations throughout the world. The efforts of the international community constantly made at the national, regional and international levels since the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action had brought about considerable achievements. A number of legal and institutional mechanisms were created to implement the Plan of Action, awareness on the origin and harmfulness of racism was further enhanced, and a series of measures were taken to address them. However, there was still a long and arduous way to go in order to realise the spirit of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action for complete eradication of racism. In spite of repeated efforts by the international community, racism still persisted in new manifestations of religious hatred, discrimination and prejudice. The Durban Review Conference was faced with the historic task of reviewing progress and assessing the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and taking up effective measures aimed at overcoming obstacles and new challenges. It was imperative to properly address the past history of racism and racial discrimination in order to eradicate them once and for all - unsettled past abuse was a source of current and future abuses.

ARNOLD DE FINE SKIBSTED (Denmark) said that the focus of the Review Conference should be racism, discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and how to combat these scourges. It was thus a deeply worrying paradox that this rostrum was abused to advocate racism and intolerance by the President of Iran on Monday. The remarks relating in particular to Israel had been so abominable that Denmark had had to react. The intervention had to be understood as incitement to hatred and ran counter to the whole purpose of the Review Conference.

Denmark had from the outset been committed to making the Review Conference a success. Numerous efforts to divert the focus of the Conference had been made, noted the delegate. This included attempts to restrict the fundamental right of freedom of opinion and expression. Denmark would never accept such limitations. Freedom of expression was one of the cornerstones of human dignity and the basis of any democratic society. Denmark was thus satisfied that the fundamental role of freedom of expression had been recognized in the outcome document as one of the essential foundations of a democratic, pluralistic society.

SAAD ALFARARGI, of the League of Arab States, said regarding hostility to religion, particularly Islamophobia, that practices went beyond ethnical and moral grounds. The League of Arab States condemned Israel's practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories as Israel clearly was violating human rights and international humanitarian law. The Palestinians who lived in Israel were oppressed on a daily basis. The League of Arab States called on the international community to condemn these practices. The Durban Review Conference should give a new impetus to the international community to mobilize itself in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. In order to meet its objectives, the Conference should strengthen its follow-up mechanisms. This could only be reached through dialogue and not absence.

KONSTANTINOS TARARAS ,of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), said the fight against racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance was at the heart of UNESCO's mandate. Its commitment was affirmed by UNESCO's role in deconstructing pseudoscientific theories of racial superiority; by its firm and unconditional stand against apartheid; and by the adoption of important normative instruments, such as the Declaration on Race and Racial Prejudice and the Convention against Discrimination in Education. The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action gave a strong impetus for renewing UNESCO's commitment in this regard. A long process of broad consultations had led to the adoption of an Integrated Strategy to Combat Racism, Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance in 2003.

SHAUNA OLNEY, of the International Labour Organization, said that racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance were contrary to human rights and dignity. They were serious obstacles to social cohesion, peace and stability. These unacceptable practices had to be understood and addressed as both causes and consequences of exclusion and poverty. The International Labour Organization's Decent Work Agenda was based on the conviction that social justice could only become a reality when men and women, irrespective of their race, colour or creed, enjoyed equal opportunities and treatment in the world of work. Saying no to racism at the workplace was key for promoting respect, tolerance and inclusiveness. Governments had a duty to honour their international commitments. However, day-to-day action to eliminate racial discrimination was a collective responsibility. Since 2001 a great number of positive steps had been taken to bring an end to racism at work and there had been an increasing recognition that diversity meant strength rather than weakness.

KHADIJA R. MASRI, of the African Union, said that the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance was the responsibility of all Member States of the United Nations, regional organizations, inter-governmental organizations, communities and non-governmental organizations, civil society and individuals throughout the world. All were duty bound to shoulder their collective and individual responsibility in combating these grave abuses and degrading treatment of human beings. As they met here today, they must not forget that the world just recently commemorated the abolishment of slavery and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Durban Declaration had particularly highlighted the values thus enshrined and it was therefore a landmark in the fight against racism. The group of universal instruments, including the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, was designed to ensure a better future for the victims of racism. The entire world was closely following this Conference and hoped for concrete action. The African Union was pleased about the consensus that had been reached and that the voice of reason that had finally lightened the path so as not to deceive the victims of racism.

LIBERE BARARUNYERETSE, of Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie, said the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie supported human rights, in particular efforts to combat racism, racial discrimination, and related intolerance. The Durban Review Conference, whose task was to review progress made following the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and progress on ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, should allow the international community to reaffirm the need to fight all forms and manifestations of discrimination within an international framework and a universal dialogue. The equality gaps and contempt for human dignity meant that all were duty-bound to maintain enhanced vigilance against political demagoguery and the isolation of whole communities. The Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie supported focused efforts in the field of human rights with marked commitment to fight this persistent scourge that affected the most vulnerable groups.

SUSAN TIMBERLAKE speaking on behalf of UNAIDS Executive Director MICHEL SIDIBE, said that UNAIDS wanted to highlight forms of discrimination that so far had not received the attention they deserved: discrimination based on health status and on social status. HIV-related discrimination continued to affect millions. This meant that families were destroyed, homes and jobs were lost and education was denied. It also meant that millions feared to get tested for HIV, disclose their status if they were positive, or seek treatment when needed. Discrimination stood directly in the way of attaining universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support. UNAIDS called on governments and others to make non-discrimination a pillar of the response to AIDS.

CLAIRE A. NELSON, of the Inter-American Development Bank, said that the credibility and effectiveness of the Inter-American Development Bank and its mandate to promote equitable growth and social equity dictated that the Bank should be sensitive to ethnicity and diversity issues. Sustainable growth could not proceed if there was social and economic exclusion. The costs of exclusion due to race and ethnicity were high. Cycles of poverty and degradation led to diminished productivity and costly violence and conflict. Human, natural and cultural resources were wasted, and potential consumer markets were lost. Since Durban, the Inter-American Development Bank had been increasingly supporting investment to address exclusion. Creating success stories would take time, but the Bank recognized that time was not on its side and so it was moving with great deliberation to engage at all levels.

ALI BAHREINI, of Non-Aligned Movement Centre for Human Rights and Cultural Diversity, said the Durban World Conference had been the start of a process to recognise the aspirations of the peoples of the world to justice and to equality of opportunity for all. The Conference had recognised the necessity of respecting and maximising the benefits of diversity within and among all nations in working together to build a harmonious and productive future by putting into practice and promoting values and principles such as justice and equality. Cultural diversity in a globalising world needed to be used as a vehicle for creativity, dynamism and promoting social justice, tolerance and understanding as well as international peace and security, and not as a rationale for a new ideological and political confrontation. A worldwide strategy against racism could only succeed with full commitment, a sense of responsibility and cooperation - the Durban Review Conference should give a further impetus and enhance the dynamism of this process which started in 2001. All on the international scene should build an international order based on inclusion, justice, equality and equity, human dignity, mutual understanding and promotion of and respect for cultural diversity and universal human rights.

PRINCE EL HASSAN BIN TALAL of Jordan, one of five Independent Eminent Experts appointed by the Secretary-General to follow-up the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, in a video message to the Durban Review Conference, said that it was important to promote the education of excluded youth through scholarships. The roots of conflicts often lay in history. States had to work together in the General Assembly to place a new template for a better future. Human warming had to take over global warming.

EDNA MARIA SANTOS ROLAND, one of five Independent Eminent Experts appointed by the Secretary-General to follow-up the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, said one of the landmarks established by the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action was the recognition that racism manifested itself in different forms for men and women and the existence of multiple or aggravated forms of discrimination that combined their effect with the consequences of racism. In spite of long discussions during the Durban process, it was not possible to reach consensus regarding factors such as gender identities and sexual orientation. A number of positive developments had taken place in the Latin American region since 2001. Governmental bodies were created in 17 countries at diverse levels of authority and autonomy; policies were developed in the areas of education, health, labour, access to land and housing; laws and regulations were approved; and networks were established in civil society, governments and international cooperation. A Rapporteur for Afro-descendents was created at the regional level and a convention on racism and discrimination was under discussion. In order to better assess the advances and challenges in the implementation of policies to promote equality, it was advisable to develop tools that were instrumental to assess the level of inequalities and to design the necessary policies.

NAELA GABR, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, said that the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women systematically addressed discrimination against women in general. The patterns for this discrimination might sometimes be very similar to other forms of discrimination mentioned in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and also addressed specific forms of multiple discrimination such as in the case of women belonging to ethnic minorities, migrant women, and victims of trafficking. Trafficking in women and violence against women, including domestic violence, continued to affect a large number of women, including female domestic workers. These scourges had a particularly negative effect on the victims in the context of double or multiple discrimination, especially with regard to colour and national origin. Governments should intensify efforts and cooperation to combat poverty as one of the main root causes of discrimination, segregation, and as an impediment to the advancement of women, and should keep under review and carefully monitor the impact of laws and policies on migrant women. The Conference should consider supporting the United Nations Global Initiative on Fighting Trafficking in Persons, and consider the particular severe forms of violence and discrimination faced by women and the girl child in all types of armed conflicts in the context of the follow-up to the Durban Review Conference.

ZONKE ZANELE MAJODINA, Vice-Chair of the Human Rights Committee, said that nearly eight years after the Durban Conference, racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance continued to jeopardize the equal enjoyment of human rights by all. Yet, all States were party to, and therefore legally bound by, one or, for most, at least five of the nine core international human rights instruments providing, inter alia, for the right to equality and non-discrimination. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provided for the protection of rights of members of ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities. When considering the reports of States parties and individual communications, the Committee had expressed concerns and had made recommendations regarding numerous issues relating to racial discrimination and to the violation of rights of persons belonging to various groups. Also, States should take firm measures to eradicate all forms of excessive use of force by law enforcement officials, in particular against members of ethnic minorities, migrants and asylum seekers. Further States should strengthen efforts to ensure the right of minorities to enjoy and develop their culture and language and to support cultural and ethnic diversity.

ASMA JAHANGIR, Chair of the Coordination Committee of Special Procedures, in a joint statement on behalf of Special Procedures mandate holders, urged the Review Conference to give due consideration in its work to the many concerns raised by Special Procedures mandate holders. National action plans must now come to the fore to combat racism and must place the emphasis clearly on real and concrete "action" at the national and especially at the grass roots level. The implementation gap continued to allow the words of the international community to fall short and laws to fail. The rule of law and the judicial mechanisms that made it a reality must be ensured as a priority. In doing so, States could send a clear message that racism and discrimination against any person was unacceptable in any form. Where impunity existed, it sanctioned further acts of racism and perpetuated a cycle of discrimination and abuse that should have no place in twenty-first century nations. To eliminate the roots and branches of racism and discrimination, education was all important. The international community must address the causes of racism as much as it must treat its consequences if one was to avoid new generations growing up tainted by prejudice.

MOHAMMED AL-TARAWNEH, Chairperson of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, said the Committee was the most recent human rights treaty body established. Throughout the ages, the treatment of people with disabilities had brought out some of the worst aspects of human nature. For the 650 million persons around the world living with disabilities, the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities began a new era, an era in which persons with disabilities would no longer have to suffer from the discriminatory practices and attitudes that had been allowed to prevail for so long. The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action recognised the linkage among racism, racial discrimination and other forms of intolerance, and discrimination based on other grounds such as disability, referring to the phenomenon of multiple or aggravated discrimination which States needed to address. The Committee urged States to review progress made in countering the phenomenon of aggravated discrimination, and to adopt specific recommendations in that regard, and called upon the Durban Review Conference to highlight the importance of the universal ratification of the Convention and its Optional Protocol as a means to eliminate discrimination against those with disabilities, including those affected by aggravated discrimination.

FATIMATA-BINTA DAH, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, said that the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination shared many similar positions with the Review Conference. Three months ago they had celebrated the fortieth anniversary of the entry into force of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Four decades was at the same time a very long period and a short time. Much remained to be done in the fight against racism. Universal ratification of the Convention, which had been set for 2005, had still not been attained. The late submission by many States of their original report was also a major obstacle of the monitoring function of the Committee. Since the first Durban conference in 2001, the Committee had endeavoured to improve its work and various thematic discussions had been organized. The current context of the financial crisis could affect different ethnic groups and minorities, such as Roma, indigenous people, refugees, migrants and persons discriminated against due to their descent. States should declare as punishable under the law all forms of discrimination. She also noted that the Committee would continue to collaborate with the Durban Follow-up mechanisms, as had been the case since 2001.

JOE FRANS, Chair of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, said that racism directed at people of African descent manifested itself in many spheres of life, including the administration of justice, the media, access to education, employment, health, housing, racial profiling, and the participation in political, economic, social and cultural aspects of society and in the advancement and economic development of their countries. Institutional racism and discrimination, including distortions in the media, affected the plight of people of African descent at the work place and the broader society. It was gratifying to note that the outcome document adopted had taken note with appreciation of the efforts to prevent, combat and eradicate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance undertaken by all mechanisms. During its last session, the Working Group reviewed methodologies employed by the Working Group so as to maximize the fulfilment of the mandate entrusted to it by the Human Rights Council. This resulted in a comprehensive and ambitious work plan. This was in line with the outcome document. The Working Group laid the foundation for a more structured and productive phase; however, it could not succeed in fulfilling its mandate without the full support of Member States and civil society.

TSELISO THIPANYANE, of International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, said combating discrimination on the grounds of race, religion and belief, ethnic and national origins and colour was an integral part of the mandate of national human rights institutions. These institutions promoted intercultural dialogue and diversity, and provided a human rights framework for addressing contentious issues. They achieved this through dispute resolution services, advocacy, the development of networks, and development of training and education. The national human rights institutions of the world were committed to working in a spirit of openness and dialogue with all for the success of the Durban Review Conference, and were committed to making constructive and practical contributions to the review process. The Durban Review Conference should not reopen the debates of 2001 - it presented an opportunity for all actors to identify practical steps to implement the anti-racism agenda, and was an important opportunity to reinvigorate the global commitment to combating racism and to close existing implementation gaps.

Right of Reply


AKIO ISOMATA (Japan), speaking in a right of reply, said in response to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's statement, Japan wanted to underline that the Government had been facing the events of the past with sincerity and had shown strong determination to solve the issues with peaceful means. He noted that through their bilateral relations, both Governments had agreed on basic principles to discuss these questions. Further, Japan had offered resident status to the Koreans living on its territory and Japan's Constitution guaranteed equality to everyone. As for the Japanese school's curriculum guidelines, the delegate underscored that it required that students should correctly understand what had led to the war and the great suffering that had resulted from it.

Source: United Nations

Offener Brief in der Affäre Bruno: Ein schwer kranker Mann bittet um Hilfe bei der mächtigsten Frau der Welt

Offener Brief in der Affäre Bruno: Ein schwer kranker Mann bittet um Hilfe bei der mächtigsten Frau der Welt

Helferkreis Buno Schillinger hofft auf Unterstützung durch sozialen und demokratischen Bundesstaat Deutschland

Von Andreas Klamm, Nachrichten-Korrespondent

March/Breisgau - Hochschwarzwald/bei Freiburg. 24. April 2009 Bruno Schillinger ist ein chronisch schwer kranker und behinderter Mann aus dem Ort March im Beisgau in der Nähe von Freiburg. Zur Zeit hat er allen Grund zur Annahme dass in der kleinen Kommune March so genannte „Speyerer Verhältnisse“ herrschen. Seit mehr als 20 Tagen erhält der Mann keine Sozialhilfe obgleich er, wie jeder andere Mensch, einen Anspruch auf die Unversehrtheit seines Lebens, seiner Gesundheit und auf soziale Sicherheit hat.


Im April 2007 wurden in der Stadt Speyer durch die zuständige ARGE, die für die Bewilligung des Arbeitslosengeldes II, auch als Hartz 4 bekannt, zuständig ist, allen Hilfen für den 20jährigen lernberhinderten André Kirsch auf 0,00 Euro gestrichen. Der junge Mann verhungerte. Die Mutter des Mannes, deren Sozial-Hilfeleistungen ebenso auf 0,00 Euro gestrichen wurden, überlebte nur Dank der couragierten und an Wunder grenzenden Hilfe von Pflegekräften, Ärztinnen und Ärzten in der Stadt Speyer.

Das wissentliche Verhungernlassen des 20jährigen lernbehinderten André Kirsch führte zum Interesse vieler Menschen in ganz Deutschland. Der Aufsehen erregende Fall, der auch mit schwersten Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Menschenwürde verglichen wurde, führte dazu, dass die Abgeordneten im Deutschen Bundestag über das Verhungernlassen des 20jährigen lernbehinderten André Kirsch debattierten. Der junge Mann wurde im April 2007 tot in einer kleinen Wohnung in Speyer am Rhein durch die Polizei damals entdeckt. Wenn heute rund zwei Jahre nach diesen schlimmen Ereignissen ein Mensch von „Speyerer Verhältnissen“ spricht, weiß in ganz Deutschland sofort jeder Mensch, dass das wissentliche Verhungernlassen und Töten von Menschen in Not mit der neuen Begrifflichkeit aus dem Jahr 2007 gemeint ist.

Bruno. S. ist ohne bestehenden Zweifel in schwerster Not, chronisch krank und behindert, doch ein „sich in die Ecke legen und still und leise verhungern“, kommt für den Mann dessen Sozial-Hilfeleistungen am 1. April 2009, das ist leider kein Scherz, auf 0,00 Euro gestrichen wurden, nicht in Frage.

Dass ein Mensch der in Not ist, in weitere durch Behörden verursachte Not gerät ist mit dem Grundgesetz, in dem Deutschland als ein sozialer und demokratischer Bundesstaat bezeichnet wird nicht zu vereinbaren, insbesondere deshalb weil jeder Mensch, auch Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen der ARGE (Arbeitsgemeinschaften von Kommunen und Bund) wissen, dass die wirtschaftliche und vorsätzliche Existenz-Vernichtung eines Menschen zum Tod eines Menschen führen kann, da ein Überleben mit 0,00 Euro in Deutschland und auch in anderen Ländern über einen längeren Zeitraum nicht möglich ist.

Jetzt ist eine Situation entstanden, die in ganz Deutschland wohl schon bald ohne jede Form der Übertreibung als die Affäre „Bruno S.“ im Land bezeichnet werden kann. Dabei ist nicht ausgeschlossen, dass diese unsägliche Angelegenheit zu einem der größten politischen Skandale in der Geschichte der Christlich Demokratischen Union Deutschlands (CDU) werden könnte.

Könnte --, zumindest dann wenn die „unabhängigen“ Medien und die „unabhängige“ Justiz die Vorgänge in dem sozialen und demokratischen Bundesstaat Deutschland zur Kenntnis nehmen sollte. Denn zur Zeit wird bei den Medien, die normalerweise frei und unabhängig und als vierte Gewalt im Staat das Wirken und Arbeiten der drei Staats-Gewalten (Leglislative, Judikative und Exekutive) auch kritisch beobachten und hinterfragen sollten, die Devise „TOTSCHWEIGEN“ angewendet.

Woran es wohl liegen mag, dass die so genannten unabhängigen Medien sich selbst zu Helfern und Sprachrohre des Unrechts machen, statt Meinungs- Presse- und Informations-Freiheit und Demokratie zu schützen, bleibt zur Zeit auch ein Rätsel und Geheimnis, das nur den reichen und mächtigen Fürsten der Finsternis und Mogulen in dieser Welt bekannt sein dürfte so scheint es. Doch aller Anschein verliert irgendwann, dies ist nur eine Frage der Zeit, seinen falschen Glanz. Einige wenige Beobachter wagen es ganz offen das in öffentlichen und politischen Kreisen nicht gern gehörte Wort „Korruption“ auszusprechen.

Kanzlerin Angela Merkel beweist in dieser Situation offenkundiger und schwerster Verletzung von Grundrechten und Menschenrechten, dass diese von Schröders Politik der „ruhigen Hand“ offenbar viel gelernt hat und diese perfekt beherrscht. Doch angesichts der Tatsache, dass laut dem amerikanischen U.S.-Magazin Forbes die Kanzlerin zum dritten Mal in der Folge als mächtigste Frau der Welt gefeiert wird, ist dies sicher keine Eigenschaft auf die die Kanzlerin stolz sein könnte.

Doch wie viel Staats-Gewalt will die Kanzlerin gegenüber einem chronisch, behinderten Mann in schwerer Not noch zulassen?

Soll etwa mit der Verachtung der Menschenwürde, der Verachtung des Grundgesetzes, der Verachtung des sozialen Friedens, der Verachtung von Freiheit und Demokratie, der Verachtung von in der Verfassung garantierten Grundrechten und mit der Verachtung der universell gültigen Allgemeinen Erklärung der Menschenrechte ein besonders starkes öffentliches Symbol der praktizierten christlichen Nächstenliebe der Partei demonstriert werden, die sich selbst Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (CDU) nennt.

Wie muss sich Bruno Schillinger zur Zeit in schwerster Not fühlen? Wird er nicht mit Recht vermuten, dass CDU nur noch für die Conservative Deutsche Unionspartei Deutschlands (CDU) steht. Kann es sich die CDU leisten das „C“, das für christlich stehen soll aus ihrem Namen und dem Programm der Partei ersatzlos zu streichen inmitten der Zeit der weltweiten Krise und Not?

Das wäre realistisch vergleichbar mit der Situation, wenn das CDU-Polit-Büro in Berlin in Flammen steht, und die Kanzlerin den herbei eilenden Feuerwehren mit dem Lächeln eines Honig-Kuchen-Pferdes voller Überzeugung, den drohenden Untergang nicht sehenden, zuruft „Jungs, ihr könnt zurück in die Wache fahren. Wir packen das auch ohne eure Hilfe.“ Das CDU-Polit-Büro wäre in einer solchen Situation dann wahrlich nicht mehr zu retten.

Würde der Namensgeber für christlich und das Christentum, der Prophet Jesus Christus die Partei als eine Vereinigung von Heuchlern bei einem erneuten Wirken auf dieser Erde öffentlich kritisieren? Die Vermutung liegt nahe, da Jesus Christus bereits vor 2000 Jahren kein Blatt vor den Mund genommen hat und stärkste Formen der Ermahnung und Kritik in den Synagogen und auch öffentlich von Angesicht zu Angesicht zu seinen Feinden leistete und publik machte. So sehr, dass über die Kritik des Propheten Jesus Christus noch 2009 nach dessen Wirken gesprochen wird und sich die große Partei in Deutschland sogar nach dessen Namen als „Christlich“ Demokratische Union Deutschlands benannte.

Noch 2009 Jahre nach dessen Wirken gilt der Prophet Jesus Christus als der größte Reformer und Sozial-Reformer aller Zeiten auch im Vergleich mit den Leistungen der mächtigsten Frau der Welt, Angela Merkel. Zur Zeit ist nur ein Fakt sicher, Jesus Christus würde sich von der Macht der mächtigsten Frau der Welt nicht beeindrucken lassen, denn bereits vor 2009 Jahren verweigerte der Prophet Jesus Christus in dem biblisch überlieferten Bericht in der Situation der Versuchung durch den Satan, dem Teufel zu dienen, um Herr über alle Reiche in dieser Welt zu werden.

Nach dem Bericht wurde der Prophet Jesus Christus vierzig Tage vom Teufel versucht. Der Teufel soll ihm, dem Bericht zufolge, alle Reiche der Welt in einem Augenblick gezeigt haben. Der Teufel sprach zu ihm: „Dir will ich all diese Macht und ihre Herrlichkeit geben; denn sie ist mir übergeben, und ich gebe sie, wem ich will. Wenn du nun vor mir anbetest, soll das alles dein sein. Jesus Christus antwortete ihm und sprach: „Weiche von mir Satan! Denn es steht geschrieben: Du sollst den Herrn, deinen Gott anbeten und ihm allein dienen“. Vergleiche hierzu Lukas-Evangelium, Kapitel 4, Vers 5 bis Vers 7.

In dem offenen Brief von Bruno Schillinger, einem schwer kranken und behinderten Mann an die mächtigste Frau der Welt geht es nicht um alle Reiche in dieser Welt. Der kranke Mann Bruno Schillinger will nicht die Macht über ein Reich erlangen, sondern fordert lediglich soziale Sicherheit und die Einhaltung von Grundrechten und Menschenrechten.

Es geht um die Zustände in dem sozialen und demokratischen Bundesstaat Deutschland (laut dem Grundgesetz), um Gesetze, Menschenrechte, christliche Nächstenliebe, Demokratie, Freiheit, Grundrechte und die Hilfeleistung.

Die Gesetze in Deutschland garantieren auch eine gewisse Form der Sicherheit, zumindest dann, wenn die Gesetze eingehalten werden, damit die Menschen sich nicht als letztes Mittel der Wahl gegenüber einer Tyrannei mit einer Revolution wehren müssen, so steht es in der Präambel der Allgemeinen Erklärung der Menschenrechte der Resolution 217 A, der Vereinten Nationen in der Proklamation (Verkündigung) vom 10. Dezember 1948.

Vermutlich wünscht sich zur Zeit in der schweren globalen Finanz- und Weltwirtschafts-Krise kein Mensch in Deutschland, Fernseh-Live-Bilder von der Enthauptung von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel zu sehen. In der Zeit der Französischen Revolution als sich die Menschen gegenüber der Tyrannei der mächtigen Fürsten und Könige in dieser Welt verteidigen mussten, wurden die Könige nicht nur aus den Königshäusern verjagt, sondern einige Könige und Königinnen wurden auch enthauptet. Angela Merkel ist eine Bundeskanzlerin und keine Königin und Deutschland ist nach dem Grundgesetz nicht die königliche Monarchie der Kanzlerin sondern ein sozialer und demokratischer Bundesstaat.

Doch so weit zurück in der Geschichte Europas muss man in Deutschland nicht blicken. Denn vor rund 64 Jahren fanden auch der Führer des so genannten 1000jährigen Reiches, der Diktator Adolf Hitler und die Nazi-Terror-Diktatur in Berlin ihr Ende als amerikanische und russische Truppen 1944 mit Panzern in die Hauptstadt rollten. Doch müssen erst wieder Panzer amerikanischer und russischer Truppen durch Berlin fahren, damit auch in Berlin erkannt wird, dass der Untergang einer neuen Diktatur bevorsteht. Laut Grundgesetz ist Deutschland zum Frieden in der Welt verpflichtet, dazu zählt auch die Einhaltung des sozialen Friedens, besonders nach den Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit die in den Jahren 1933 bis 1945 in Deutschland stattgefunden haben.

Ist es nicht nach dem Strafgesetz des Staates so, dass ein Mörder und der Anstifter zum Mord bestraft werden. In der Regel ist dies die Situation, wer einen anderen Menschen zum Mord anstiftet, muss wie auch der Tat-ausführende Mörder oder Mörderin in der Regel vor dem Gesetz mit einer Verurteilung und Strafe rechnen.

In diesem Staat ist es allerhöchste Zeit, dass Menschen es sich wagen, zu zeigen, dass der Staat noch Anstand kennt und dass es noch Menschen gibt, die die freiheitlich-demokratische Grundordnung, Grundrechte und Menschenrechte einhalten und verteidigen, denn sonst droht Deutschland ohne jede Hoffnung im Chaos unter zugehen und die Feinde von Freiheit, Grundrechten und Menschenrechten würden siegen.

Wie viel an Gesetzes-Bruch, Menschenverachtung, Verletzung und Verachtung der Menschenwürde, Verletzung von Grundrechten und Menschenrechten kann sich Deutschland inmitten der Zeit der Krise noch leisten?

Dabei wäre das die Chance, inmitten der Krise. Wenn inzwischen auch schon dem „Mittelstand“ und einigen Menschen in höheren Etagen das Geld, das Materielle ausgeht, dann ist es um so wichtiger, Gesetze, Menschenwürde und Menschenrechte in Deutschland zu schützen, zu achten und zu wahren, damit künftige Generationen nicht von den neuen Verbrechen des „Neo-Nazi Deutschland in den Jahren 2000 und folgende...“ im Geschichte-Unterricht sprechen müssen.

Kann es wirklich sein, dass Vorkommnisse, wie eine gesetzwidrige Verhaftung ohne Haftbefehl, die Aussetzung eines schwer kranken Menschen, von den vielen anderen Verletzungen und Verachtungen der Grundrechte, der Menschen-Würde und Menschenrechte nicht zu sprechen, straffrei bleiben in einem Land, das im Grundgesetz öffentlich bekundet: „Die Bundesrepublik ist ein sozialer und demokratischer Bundesstaat.“

Der kleine Ort March hat Glück, dass Bruno Schillinger nicht bereits ein Opfer von größtem Unrecht, Unterdrückung und Willkür geworden ist, nachdem ihm am 1. Apri 2009 die Sozialhilfe auf 0,00 Euro gestrichen wurde.

Doch dies ist nicht der Verdienst der Gemeinde March, sondern nur DANK einer Gruppe aktiver Bürger und Bürgerinnen möglich, die sich sich zum „Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger“ zusammengefunden haben und sich für die Wahrung und Einhaltung von sozialen und demokratischen Grundrechten und Menschenrechten engagieren und dem behinderten und schwer kranken Mann Bruno helfen, damit nicht erneut „Speyerer Verhältnisse“ zum nicht notwendigen Verhungernlassen und Tod eines Menschen in Deutschland führen.

Nach zahlreichen Schreiben an politische Spitzen-Vertreter versucht der Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger jetzt über den Weg eines offenen Briefes endlich Bewegung in die Angelegenheit zu bringen.

Bruno S. ist chronisch schwer krank, verzweifelt und in schwerster Not, doch statt sich „brav in die Ecke zu legen und zu verhungern“, versucht er jetzt Hilfe zu finden bei der mächtigsten Frau der Welt, laut dem U.S.-Magazin Forbes und schrieb einen offenen Brief an die CDU-Partei-Vorsitzende und Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel.

Das couragierte Engagement des Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger ist ein Beispiel für das friedvolle Engagement für soziale Gerechtigkeit, Demokratie, Grundrechte und Menschenrechte und daher wollen wir dieses Engagement unseren Lesern und Leserinnen nicht vorenthalten.

Zitat des offenen Briefes von Bruno S. in vollem Umfang:

„Offener Brief an Frau Merkel (Bundeskanzlerin und CDU Vorsitzende) zu dem unchristlichen Verhalten Ihres Parteifreundes beim Tod von Brunos Vater und den Machenschaften in der ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald.


Sehr geehrte Frau Merkel,

wir hatten Sie mehrfach um Hilfe gebeten und entsprechende Informationen gegeben, doch von Ihnen kam nur Hohn zu den Machenschaften Ihres christlichen Parteifreundes beim Tode von Brunos Vater, der mehrjährigen Stellensabotage durch die ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald und der Terrorisierung von Bruno durch Politiker- und Beamtenkollegen Ihres Parteifreundes.

Wir fordern Sie öffentlich auf:

1. Bitten Sie Ihren Parteifreund seine Taten beim undurchsichtigen Tod von Brunos Vater offenzulegen! Bitten Sie ihn, dass er der Familie endlich persönlich gegenübertritt. Das er sich nicht weiter hinter seinem, vor den Hinterbliebenen und dem Landgericht lügenden Anwalt, versteckt. Bringen Sie den Hinterbliebenen durch die Wahrheit ihren Frieden, nach all den Jahren.

2. Stoppen Sie die mehrjährige Sabotage von Brunos Arbeitssuche durch die ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald und Vorgesetzte und helfen die Verantwortlichen zur Verantwortung zu ziehen. Sie wissen schon lange wissen, das Ihr Parteifreund in dieser ARGE aktiv ist.

3. Lassen Sie die illegale Verhaftung und Aussetzung von Bruno, im Auftrag Ihres Parteifreundes, durch Obergerichtsvollzieher und Polizei untersuchen. Ebenso wie die anderen Vorgänge in der Freiburger Justiz, in der Ihr Parteifreund ebenfalls aktiv ist. Einer Justiz die auf die Strafanzeigen zur illegalen Verhaftung, Aussetzung und dem sonstigen Terror lapidar mitteilt, dass unsere Briefe nicht beantwortet werden.

Frau Merkel, Sie haben Bruno Schillinger aus dem CDU Grundsatzprogramm mitteilen lassen: "Die Würde des Menschen - auch des ungeborenen und des sterbenden - ist unantastbar.". Unternommen wurde von Ihnen nichts, obwohl Ihr Parteifreund eindeutig dagegen verstoßen hat. Dies ist für uns die zusätzliche Verhöhnung der Hinterbliebenen. Ihr Parteifreund hat Brunos Vater ins Krankenhaus gebracht, ihn dort wochenlang dahin siechen lassen, bis zum Tod, ohne die Familie zu informieren. Er hat nicht nur den letzten Abschied verhindert, sondern auch den Verstorbenen einfach einäschern und anonym begraben lassen, mit zusammen gebastelten Vollmachten. Die trauernde Familie wurden kaltschnäuzig belogen, wie auch die Gerichte.

Frau Merkel, so etwas ist für uns nur noch unchristlich und unmenschlich. Öffnen Sie Ihre Augen! Erkennen Sie das unnötige Leid das Ihr Parteifreund verursacht hat!

Doch Ihr Parteifreund arbeitet nicht alleine. Seit über 3 Jahren wird Bruno in der Arbeitslosigkeit gefangen gehalten. Stellenzusagen und Vorstellungsgespräche wurden durch die ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald erfolgreich hintertrieben.

Arbeitslosengeld 2 von über 30.000 EURO verschwendet. Zum Schutz Ihres Parteifreundes?* Nachforschungen werden verweigert; Bruno in den finanziellen und gesundheitlichen Ruin getrieben; eine Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde verschwand teilweise; der Fallmanagerbericht in der ARGE wurde heimlich geändert und damit gefälscht, Zwangsumzug trotz 20-jähriger Mietdauer; Urteile des Bundessozialgerichtes werden umgangen. Sogar der Bundestag wurde von der ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald, einer Behörde, belogen. Alles Zufall? Sicher nicht, denn Sie wissen bereits, in welcher Behörde Ihr Parteifreund aktiv ist. Doch die ARGE blockte, wie Landratsamt, lokale Agentur für Arbeit und Bundesagentur. Kein Interesse an Wahrheit! Geht Kollegenschutz tatsächlich vor?

Frau Merkel, wieso akzeptieren Sie dies alles? Wieso akzeptieren Sie die dubiosen Machenschaften beim Todesfall; das verweigern des letzten Abschiedes; belügen der Trauernden; den Verstoß Ihres Parteifreundes gegen das eigene CDU-Grundsatzprogramm; die Machenschaften in Behörden zugunsten eines Politiker- Beamtenkollegen und gegen die Bürger; illegale Verhaftung und Aussetzung; bis zum belügen des Bundestages. Das fehlen jeglicher Achtung vor Grundgesetz, Diensteid, Verantwortung, Wahrheit und Menschlichkeit.

Ist dies die wahre CDU? Die neue Mitte? Ist dies die Basis der christlichen Politik?

Wir fordern Sie ausdrücklich auf, stehen Sie zu Ihrem Amtseid, dem Grundgesetz und der Menschlichkeit. Sorgen Sie für eine öffentliche und neutrale Untersuchung. Helfen Sie den Hinterbliebenen. Damit diese nach all den Jahren durch die Wahrheit wenigstens etwas Frieden finden.

Frau Merkel, brechen Sie Ihr Schweigen, beenden Sie diese unheilige Allianz aus Politik und Bürokratie, die Ihren Parteifreund schützt und Bruno gnadenlos verfolgt. Frau Merkel, arbeiten Sie für alle Menschen, stehen Sie den Bürgern bei. Oder schicken Sie Bruno tatsächlich für die Wahrheit ins Gefängnis? Sind die Zeiten wieder so weit?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger
www.kassensturz-jetzt.de“


Ende des Zitates des offenen Briefes von Bruno Schillinger an Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel.

Der offene Brief des nach Hilfe suchenden Bruno Schillinger wird von einer Helfer-Gruppe unterstützt, die sich selbst „Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger“ nennt. Unklar ist, welche Menschen zum „Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger“ zählen. Der „Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger“ ergänzte den offenen Brief mit folgenden Angaben.

ZITAT der Informationen des „Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger“:


„Anmerkung zum offenen Brief von Seiten der Helfergruppe:
Leitet diesen offenen Brief bitte weiter und unterstützt Bruno – herzlichen Dank.
Auf der Internetseite und bei anderen Unterstützern findet Ihr auch eine Unterschriftenliste zum download – oder sendet eure Solidaritätsmail an helftbruno@hotmail.de .

Fordert Aufklärung aller Machenschaften, auch zur Stellensabotage in der ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald. Fragt eure Abgeordneten, besonders die christlichen, wieso sie nur schweigen. Fordert Ihre Unterstützung bei der Aufklärung und die Distanzierung von ihrem christlichen Parteifreund.

Bruno ist nur einer von vielen, die dem Moloch Bürokratie geopfert werden, um die Beamten- und Politikerkollegen zu schützen.

Wir verlangen Transparenz, besonders in Politik und Bürokratie. Schluss mit dem Führerprinzip in der Bürokratie.

* "Eine pflichtwidrige Vernichtung von Kapital ist eine Straftat", hatte Wulff gesagt.
http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,611664,00.html

angela.merkel@bundestag.de
internetpost@bundeskanzlerin.de
angela.merkel@cdu.de

Auch andere christliche Politiker wurden oft um Unterstützung gebeten und schwiegen nur, von Oettinger, über Söder, van der Leyen, Guttenberg, Wulff, Koch, usw. und alle schwiegen, als sie herausfanden, was ihr Parteifreund getan hatte. Ebenso wurden alle Abgeordneten des Bundestages und Landtages BW mehrfach über die Machenschaften der ARGE Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald und die anderen Taten informiert. Ebenso die Kreisräte, die eigentlich das Landratsamt beaufsichtigen sollten. Alle haben diese Machenschaften durch Schweigen und Nichtstun offenbar akzeptiert oder die eigene Überflüssigkeit bewiesen.

Fußnoten :

- Illegale Verhaftung Amtsgericht Freiburg am 18/10/08 Samstag im Auftrag des CDU Politikers – danach Aussetzung – Aufklärung keine - Webseite - Gefängnis
- Petition zu Fahrtkostenerstattung bei ARGE Terminen nach ARGE Lüge zuerst zurückgewiesen, seitdem ausgesessen – Webseite Presse
- Zweite Petition weil die Bearbeitung der ersten Petition nach der ARGE Lüge ausgesessen wird – Webseite Presse
- Urteil BSG Urteil zu Fahrtkosten zur ARGE Terminen – statt Erstattung wird in den Vorladungen geschrieben (05/02/09) "Unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen können Reisekosten erstattet werden" – Was sind das für Voraussetzungen? Muss dem Bedürftigen das Urteil bekannt sein, um seine Kosten erstattet bekommen?
- ärztliche Behandlungen werden verhindert, weil Hartz4 diese Fahrtkosten nicht berücksichtigt.

Die Krankenkassen müssen ambulante Behandlungen nicht übernehmen.

- Wie kann eine Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde gegen ARGE Geschäftsführer und Fallmanagerin teilweise verschwinden? Wie kann der Geschäftsführer sie einfach mündlich zurückweisen und seinen eigenen Namen einfach übersehen? Wieso schweigen die Vorgesetzten, bis zu BA Chef Weise und MP Oettinger?

- Aus der Mail von "Auszug aus Mail im Auftrag von Angela Merkel Bundeskanzlerin/CDU Vorsitzende (Frau Kroha) 08.07.2008 10:34
AW: CDU - Ihre Anfrage CRM:07360080"

Die Würde des Menschen - auch des ungeborenen und des sterbenden - ist unantastbar. aus Randnummern 5 – 9:

Präambel: „Wir Christliche Demokraten bekennen uns im Bewusstsein unserer Verantwortung vor Gott und den Menschen mit diesem Grundsatzprogramm zu unseren Werten und Zielen und geben Antworten auf die Herausforderungen unserer Zeit. Zitate aus dem Grundsatzprogramm der CDU

Amtseid Bundeskanzlerin


"Ich schwöre, dass ich meine Kraft dem Wohle des deutschen Volkes widmen, seinen Nutzen mehren, Schaden von ihm wenden, das Grundgesetz und die Gesetze des Bundes wahren und verteidigen, meine Pflichten gewissenhaft erfüllen und Gerechtigkeit gegen jedermann üben werde. (So wahr mir Gott helfe)."

Grundgesetz Art. 1

"Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar. Sie zu achten und zu schützen ist Verpflichtung aller staatlichen Gewalt."


Diensteid Beamte/öffentlicher Dienst


"Ich schwöre, das Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und alle in der Bundesrepublik geltenden Gesetze zu wahren und meine Amtspflichten gewissenhaft zu erfüllen."

Beamte müssen nach Recht und Gesetz handeln (Gesetzestreue). Weisungen Vorgesetzter sind grundsätzlich zu befolgen (Gehorsamspflicht; Anmerkung ehem. Führerprinzip).

Ende des Zitats der Anmerkungen des „Helferkreis Bruno Schillinger“.


Ausführliche und weitere Informationen zur Situation von Bruno Schillinger sind bei www.kassensturz-jetzt.de zu finden.

Warum in Deutschland keine politischen Entscheidungsträger und Entscheidungsträgerinnen gefunden werden, die die Grundrechte und Menschenrechte des behinderten Mannes schützen und zumindest sich für die Einhaltung der Menschenrechte und Grundrechte von Bruno S. engagieren ist zur Zeit nicht bekannt.

Bleibt zu hoffen, dass die Kanzlerin, die sich erst vor kurzem zu ihren christlichen Überzeugungen öffentlich bekannt hat, die Bitte um Hilfe an einen Mann, der schwer krank und in großer Not ist, nicht verweigern wird und dessen Rehabilitation ermöglichen wird und die Grundrechte und Menschenrechte einhalten und schützen wird.


Liberty and Peace NOW! Human Rights Reporters
internationales Medien-Projekt für Menschenrechte

www.menschenrechtsreporter.blogspot.com
www.humanrightsreporters.wordpress.com
www.menschenrechtsreporter.de.be
www.libertyandpeacenow-online.de.be

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Γαλλικά-Γερμανικά Δημοσιογράφος Ανδρέας Klamm δημοσίευσε νέα βιβλία στη Γαλλία



Γαλλικά-Γερμανικά Δημοσιογράφος Ανδρέας Klamm δημοσίευσε νέα βιβλία στη Γαλλία

Λονδίνο / Παρίσι. 23 Απριλίου 2009. Η γαλλο-γερμανική δημοσιογράφος, Ανδρέας Klamm, έχει δημοσιεύθηκε πρόσφατα δύο νέα βιβλία στην πόλη των Παρισίων, στη Γαλλία, στην αγγλική, γαλλική και γερμανική γλώσσα.


Τα βιβλία έχουν ως αποστολή την Amy Goodman ένα βραβευμένο δημοσιογράφο από τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής και περιέχουν πολλές πληροφορίες σχετικά με θέματα όπως τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα, την πολιτική, τη δημοκρατία, την ελευθερία του Τύπου, τη διεθνή κατανόηση και την κοινωνία.

Ο παππούς της Γαλλίας-Γερμανίας δημοσιογράφος Ανδρέας Klamm είναι η πρώην γαλλική-Αξιωματικός Στρατού και της γαλλικής πολίτης, ο κ. Haedi Sabaot. Ο γαλλικός στρατός είχε Officer σταθμεύουν το 1945 στη γερμανική πόλη του Kaiserslautern. Ο παππούς του δημοσιογράφου λείπει από το 1945.

Ανδρέας Klamm εργάζεται ως δημοσιογράφος, εκπομπή δημοσιογράφος, συγγραφέας, την τηλεόραση, το ραδιόφωνο και παραγωγός κινηματογραφικών παραγωγών από το 1984. Έχει λάβει για ορισμένες από τις τηλεοπτικής παραγωγής για τη δημόσια γερμανική τηλεόραση σχετικά με τη δημοσιογραφία, τη διεθνή κατανόηση και τη δημοκρατία κατά τα έτη 1986, 1987, 1988 βραβεία και τις προσφορές από γερμανικό τμήμα του κράτους για πολιτικά Παιδείας.

Από το 1986, Ανδρέας Klamm διαχείριση είναι η εκδότης του British Newsflash Magazine, από το 2006 είναι επίσης η διαχείριση συντάκτη της Ελευθερίας και Ειρήνης ΤΩΡΑ! Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων των Δημοσιογράφων, μια διεθνή μέσα ενημέρωσης για το έργο των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων και από τον Δεκέμβριο του 2008 έχει αναλάβει τη διαχείριση του εκδότη του Διεθνούς ειδήσεις και την αποστολή του περιοδικού MJB Αποστολή News (ISSN 1999-8414).

Ανδρέας Klamm έχει δημοσιεύσει επτά βιβλία. Τέσσερις περισσότερα βιβλία στην αγγλική και γερμανική γλώσσα από το δημοσιογράφο και συγγραφέα του έχουν δημοσιευθεί στην Γερμανία.

Ανδρέας Klamm είναι μέλος της Διεθνούς Ομοσπονδίας Δημοσιογράφων στις Βρυξέλλες, και πολλά άλλα εθνικά και διεθνή οργανισμό ή δημοσιογράφων και συγγραφέων.

Τα βιβλία του δημοσιογράφου και συγγραφέα είναι διαθέσιμα σε όλες βιβλίου αποθήκης στη Γαλλία, τη Γερμανία, την Ελβετία και την Αυστρία και μπορεί να παραγγελθεί και με βιβλία online καταστήματα όπως www.amazon.fr, www.amazon.de και πολλοί άλλοι.

Ανδρέας Klamm εργάζεται ως δημοσιογράφος σε χώρες όπως οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής, το Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο, τη Γαλλία, το Βέλγιο, το Τόγκο και τη Γερμανία.

Περισσότερες πληροφορίες είναι διαθέσιμες στην www.andreas-klamm-books.de.be , www.andreasklamm.blogspot.com και www.andreasklamm.de.be


Books by the French-German journalist, broadcast journalist, writer, author, TV producer, radio producer and film producer, Andreas Klamm, since 1984

France (Frankreich)

Liberty, Peace and Media: Amy Goodman And The Freedom Of The Press - Excellent Journalists In Extraordinary Times, Books on Demand Gmbh; Paris, France; (Februar 2009), 276 pages (Seiten), Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist. Language: English / German (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual); ISBN-10: 2-8106-0269-7 , ISBN-13: 978-2-8106-0269-8. 19,49 Euro


Liberty and Peace NOW! Human Rights Reporters 2, Human Rights
, abuses and violations of Human Rights, international understanding, Editeur BOD Paris, France, (February 2009), 280 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist, Language: English / German (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual); ISBN-10: 2-8106-0427-4, ISBN-13: 9-782-8106-0427-2. 19.49 Euro

Germany (Deutschland)


Liberty, Peace and Media: Amy Goodman - Excellent Journalists In Extraordinary Times, Books on Demand Gmbh; Norderstedt, Deutschland; (Februar 2009), 264 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist. Language: English / German, (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual); ISBN-10: 3-8370-7473-0, ISBN-13: 978-383707473. 18,90 Euro

Liberty and Peace NOW! Human Rights Reporters :: Medienprojekt Menschenrechts-Reporter :: Edition 2008, No. 1, Human Rights, abuses and violations of Human Rights, international understanding: Books on Demand Gmbh; Edition 1, (October 2008), 272 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist. Language English / German (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual), ISBN-10: 3-8370-7243-6 , ISBN-13: 978-3-8370-7243-3. 19,99 Euro

British Newsflash Magazine :: Magazin-Buch: Edition 2008, No. 1, Themen und Berichte aus Politik, Soziales und Gesellschaft
, Issues from politics, social affairs and society, 200 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, journalist, Publishing house /Publishing centre: Books on Demand Gmbh; Edition 1, (June 2008), Language: German / English (Sprachen: Deutsch mit weiteren Artikel in englischer Sprache), ISBN-10: 3-8370-4600-1, ISBN-13: 978-3-8370-4600-7. 28,90 Euro

Die Kinder der John Baptist Mission in Togo: Mission und Hilfe für Kinder, (The children of the John Baptist Mission in Togo: Mission and help for children), 200 pages (Seiten), Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist, Publishing house / Publishing centre: Books on Demand Gmbh; Edition 1, (August 2008), Language: English, German and articles by co-authors in the French language. (Sprachen: Deutsch und mit Artikel von Co-Autoren in französischer und englischer Sprache), ISBN-10: 3-8370-5762-3, ISBN-13: 978-3-8370-5762-1. 15,99 Euro

Français-allemand journaliste Andreas Klamm a publié de nouveaux livres en France



Français-allemand journaliste Andreas Klamm a publié de nouveaux livres en France

Londres / Paris. 23 avril 2009. Le journaliste franco-allemande, Andreas Klamm, a récemment publié deux nouveaux livres dans la ville de Paris, en France, en anglais, en français et en langue allemande.

Les livres sont dédiés à Amy Goodman primé journaliste des Etats-Unis d'Amérique et contiennent beaucoup d'informations sur des questions telles que les droits de l'homme, la politique, la démocratie, la liberté de la presse, de la compréhension internationale et de la société.


Le grand-père de la journaliste franco-allemand Andreas Klamm est l'ancien français-Army Officer et citoyen Français, M. Haedi Sabaot. L'armée Française agent a été affecté en 1945 dans la ville allemande de Kaiserslautern. Le grand-père de la journaliste est disparu depuis 1945.

Andreas Klamm travaille comme un journaliste, journaliste, auteur, producteur de télévision, producteur de radio et producteur de films depuis 1984. Il a reçu de certains de ses production de télévision sur la télévision publique allemande sur le journalisme, la compréhension internationale et de la démocratie dans les années 1986, 1987, 1988, prix et promotions par un ministère allemand de l'État pour l'éducation politique.

Depuis 1986, Andreas Klamm est la rédactrice en chef de British Newsflash Magazine, depuis 2006, il est également le rédacteur en chef de la Liberty and Peace NOW! Human Rights Reporters (Liberté et de la paix maintenant!, www.libertyandpeacenow-online.de.be ) Reporters des droits de l'homme, un projet pour les médias internationaux des droits de l'homme et, depuis Décembre 2008 il est rédacteur en chef de la mission et internationale news magazine MJB Mission News (ISSN 1999-8414).

Andreas Klamm a publié sept livres. Quatre autres livres en anglais et en langue allemande par le journaliste et l'auteur ont été publiés en Allemagne.

Andreas Klamm est membre de la Fédération internationale des journalistes à Bruxelles (www.ifj.org ) et beaucoup d'autres organisations nationales et internationales ou des journalistes et des auteurs.

Les livres de la journaliste et l'auteur sont disponibles dans tous les livres en France, en Allemagne, en Suisse et en Autriche, et peuvent être commandés en ligne également avec des livres tels que les magasins www.amazon.fr, www.amazon.de et bien d'autres.

Andreas Klamm travaille comme journaliste dans des pays comme les États-Unis d'Amérique, le Royaume-Uni, la France, la Belgique, le Togo et l'Allemagne.

Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur www.andreas-klamm-books.de.be , www.andreasklamm.blogspot.com et www.andreasklamm.de.be

Books by the French-German journalist, broadcast journalist, writer, author, TV producer, radio producer and film producer, Andreas Klamm, since 1984

France (Frankreich)

Liberty, Peace and Media: Amy Goodman And The Freedom Of The Press - Excellent Journalists In Extraordinary Times, Books on Demand Gmbh; Paris, France; (Februar 2009), 276 pages (Seiten), Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist. Language: English / German (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual); ISBN-10: 2-8106-0269-7 , ISBN-13: 978-2-8106-0269-8. 19,49 Euro


Liberty and Peace NOW! Human Rights Reporters 2, Human Rights
, abuses and violations of Human Rights, international understanding, Editeur BOD Paris, France, (February 2009), 280 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist, Language: English / German (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual); ISBN-10: 2-8106-0427-4, ISBN-13: 9-782-8106-0427-2. 19.49 Euro

Germany (Deutschland)


Liberty, Peace and Media: Amy Goodman - Excellent Journalists In Extraordinary Times, Books on Demand Gmbh; Norderstedt, Deutschland; (Februar 2009), 264 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist. Language: English / German, (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual); ISBN-10: 3-8370-7473-0, ISBN-13: 978-383707473. 18,90 Euro

Liberty and Peace NOW! Human Rights Reporters :: Medienprojekt Menschenrechts-Reporter :: Edition 2008, No. 1, Human Rights, abuses and violations of Human Rights, international understanding: Books on Demand Gmbh; Edition 1, (October 2008), 272 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist. Language English / German (Sprachen: Englisch / Deutsch, bi-lingual), ISBN-10: 3-8370-7243-6 , ISBN-13: 978-3-8370-7243-3. 19,99 Euro

British Newsflash Magazine :: Magazin-Buch: Edition 2008, No. 1, Themen und Berichte aus Politik, Soziales und Gesellschaft
, Issues from politics, social affairs and society, 200 pages (Seiten). Author: Andreas Klamm, journalist, Publishing house /Publishing centre: Books on Demand Gmbh; Edition 1, (June 2008), Language: German / English (Sprachen: Deutsch mit weiteren Artikel in englischer Sprache), ISBN-10: 3-8370-4600-1, ISBN-13: 978-3-8370-4600-7. 28,90 Euro

Die Kinder der John Baptist Mission in Togo: Mission und Hilfe für Kinder, (The children of the John Baptist Mission in Togo: Mission and help for children), 200 pages (Seiten), Author: Andreas Klamm, Journalist, Publishing house / Publishing centre: Books on Demand Gmbh; Edition 1, (August 2008), Language: English, German and articles by co-authors in the French language. (Sprachen: Deutsch und mit Artikel von Co-Autoren in französischer und englischer Sprache), ISBN-10: 3-8370-5762-3, ISBN-13: 978-3-8370-5762-1. 15,99 Euro